Writing a Scientific Research Paper
Writing a scientific research paper can be challenging and problematic. Let's face it, they require so much information and data, and the scope of the research should be pretty narrowed. This article is intended to provide key information about writing such papers.
When am I ready to write?
The main thing about beginning is a good topic. You are ready to write only in case when you have some topic that is relevant in the field. Moreover, this topic should be backed up with solid undeniable information to help you to prove your main ideas. Otherwise, you won't be able to tell the readers that your paper is indeed important. So, what you should do is carry out the research of the current literature about your topic and establish you thesis. By this time, your tutor will most likely give you a green light to begin writing process.
So, now I have a topic. What to do next?
Once you reviewed the literature, you already should have a couple of ideas on how to start your scientific research paper. At this point, you should not be worried about the quality of sentence structures, the main goal is to write and fill your paper with information. You will most likely encounter that revisions will be constant, so the more ideas you have for your content, the better. It will speed up the process. Ask your tutor for recommendations on the structure of your paper. There are common requirements but typically students are presented with detailed instructions on the structure. Let's start with discussion of parts of a scientific research papers.
Materials and methods
Here you need to describe your actions which you applied in order to prove the point of the paper. These actions might include research techniques, computer software and so on. You need to be as descriptive and precise as possible. It is recommended to start writing your research paper with this section.
Experienced writers recommend to proceed with the Results section. You will need to write about the scientific data used in the paper and exclude information about its importance to the discussion (this will be included in corresponding section). For example: "The research found the X rate to be 189 ions." (appropriate) "The research found the X rate corresponding to the Johnson model." (inappropriate). The first example is the correct to use because it states about the measured value. On the other hand, the second example tries to interpret the results. As it was stated above, this information should be included in the next reviewed section, discussion.
Now you should interpret your results described in the Results section. It is done by proving that your data is important to the field in question and what future directions can your research take. Experienced writer suggest the following technique of writing a Discussion: when you describe some point in the Discussion, make a note that will remind you that you need to explain this point in the Introduction. So using such method you will have ideas to include in the Introduction.